Yaarian Reviews from Bollywood Hungama!

Divya Khosla Kumar is no stranger to the entertainment industry. Besides directing several videos, she has also acted in a big-budget film starring A-list actors [AB TUMHARE HAWALE WATAN SATHIYO]. So when Divya -- the wife of the head honcho of T-Series [Bhushan Kumar] -- decided to make a feature-film, everyone expected her to start with top of the line stars/creme-de-la-creme in her maiden venture. Instead, she chose to cast rank newcomers in principal roles -- a move that raised eyebrows.

Post the super-success of STUDENT OF THE YEAR, helmed by Karan Johar and AASHIQUI-2, helmed by Mohit Suri, which was a game changer, several studios as well as reputed raconteurs are executing qualitative projects with fresh faces. YAARIYAN, which marks the directorial debut of Divya Khosla Kumar, stands out from films of its ilk. Reason: While the principal cast boasts of freshers, the making, opulence and splendor is at par with any mega-budget film attempted in Bollywood. The question that crosses your mind is, is YAARIYAN equally big in terms of content? Let's evaluate...

First, the plot! The film starts with the college principal [Gulshan Grover] summoning five students, handing them the responsibility of saving the college campus from a foreign hotelier who intends making a resort. The deal is that in order to save the college, the Indian students should outdo their Australian counterparts in the test of physical and mental abilities. While there are the expected ups, downs and betrayals, what triumphs in the end is friendship, as the title suggests. 

I genuinely believe that the teenage years are the best phase of your life. When one is well ensconced in the dreamy world. When life is yet to throw challenges towards you... Divya Khosla Kumar attempts to encapsulate that period through the lead characters of her movie. In fact, it won't be erroneous to state that YAARIYAN attempts to pay tribute to that phase of an individual's life. 

Evidently, Divya Khosla Kumar seems to be an ardent fan of movies such as JO JEETA WOHI SIKANDAR, KUCH KUCH HOTA HAI, JAANE TU... YA JAANE NA, 3 IDIOTS and STUDENT OF THE YEAR, since there are faint echoes of such acclaimed films in her maiden endeavor. Of course, the premise of YAARIYAN is dissimilar and so are the character sketches.

The first half of YAARIYAN has its moments of fun, although the narrative tends to go astray at times. If one were to pinpoint the deficiencies, the romance between the professors appears forced in the narrative. Also, Himansh's cousin being attacked by members of the Australian team lacks conviction. The humor/liveliness also dries up after a point and one feels that the first half -- which commenced with lively and funny moments -- could've been succinct by at least 10/15 minutes. 

However, the writing gets consistent in the post-interval portions. The mountain biking race as also the rock climbing contest is the mainstay of the film. They are brilliantly executed! Prior to that, the tender moments shared by the lead pair works decently well too. Divya also gets the intensity in the emotional sequences spot on. Additionally, the dazzling locales and magnificent cinematography translate into a truly good looking film. 

Divya deserves kudos for accepting the challenge of directing freshers in her debut film. The best of storytellers are not afraid of taking risks and Divya seems to be one of those. Her handling of the humorous moments as well as the emotional ones with maturity confirms the fact that she knows the craft well. But one does feel that the writing could've been sharp edged at places. One of the USPs of the film is -- no prizes for guessing this one! -- the musical score, which has the word 'Chartbuster' written all over it. In fact, every track has caught on big time with listeners, especially 'Baarish' [soulful], 'Sunny Sunny' [a rage with partygoers], 'ABCD' [foot-tapping], 'Allah Waariyan' [melodic] and 'Meri Maa' [makes you moist-eyed]. Cinematography is top notch, with the DoP [Sameer Arya] capturing the spectacular locales with flourish. The opening and end credits are also innovative and catch your eye! 

Now to the performances! Agree, the beginners don't set the screen ablaze at the very start itself, but the performances grow on you gradually. Himansh Kohli is earnest and endearing. He has the makings of a fine actor. Rakul Preet looks beautiful and acts confidently. The way she emotes with her eyes is commendable. Nicole Faria, Dev Sharma, Shreyas Pardiwalla, Serah Singh and Vikas Verma are appropriate in their respective parts. Evelyn Sharma looks gorgeous and does a fine job.

Gulshan Grover is wonderfully restrained. Deepti Naval and Smita Jaykar are perfect.

On the whole, YAARIYAN has a gripping second half, smash hit musical score and the youthful romance that should lure and entice its target audience -- the youth. A treat for youngsters and young at heart!

Rating:****

http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/moviemicro/criticreview/id/566831 

Oru Indian Pranayakatha Review from TOI.

Story: The film is about the life of a young political leader and his association with a woman who comes unexpectedly into his life.

Oru Indian Pranayakatha oozes with fond recollections from some of the earlier accomplishments of Sathyan Anthikad. It narrates the tale of a youth who chooses politics as his career. His acts and motives - all driven by ambition - are drenched in sarcasm, something highly redolent of Sandesham.
 
The transformation of Sidharthan (Fahadh), the young political leader is then triggered by his association with a woman, who is smarter and more sensible than the lead male characters in Anthikad's films. Amala Paul plays a Canadian citizen of Malayali origin named Irene Gardiner. 

In a film that treads at a studied pace with hardly any eventful situations, the good-natured moments belong to Fahadh. His insouciant charm blends with an earthy humour. Fahad is unabashed while bringing out the inflated ego of an aspiring young politician and his associated cockiness. His indulgence in self-debasement is hearty and his open exposition of ignorance is ridiculously funny.

Amala Paul is more mature while dealing with emotional outbursts. She unassumingly lets Fahadh devour the fun whenever they share comic situations, something that works well for her as she seems perfectly in control. The plot is more or less confined to him, his foiled ambitions as a politician, his romance, his feelings for a woman who brings about a slow shift in his life. It is this apparent simplicity that makes the film at once engaging and more often banal. 

The joviality happens naturally, the mush is forced and jarring. There is not even a faint attempt at doing away with stereotypes although there are glimpses of promise at certain moments which never really crystallize into a heart-warmer of a film.

Rating:***
 
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/malayalam/movies/movie-reviews/Oru-Indian-Pranayakatha/movie-review/27751337.cms

Ezhu Sundara Rathrikal Review from Times of India!!

Story: The film moves around relationships of four individuals that get intertwined resulting in complexities that affect their lives.

Lal Jose dabbles in a maze of relationships in Ezhu Sundara Rathrikal. It's about people who are waiting to get married and those who are already married. The film leaves links inter-connecting all those involved in it. The result is a narrative that goes slightly out of control after the initial good-natured humour which Dileep brings to the table.

Aby (Dileep) is an ad-maker waiting to get married to Ann (Parvathy). His old flame Rima Kallingal returns to the city where he lives and their encounter sets off a series of events bordering on confusions, misunderstandings, sense of guilt and the pain of loss.

Lal Jose intently tries to hold the complexities with a sense of triviality. He does away with tears and piano at times of grave emotional crises and would instead squeeze in cartoonish sequences. The light-hearted treatment works to an extent, but not for long as the narrative is crippled by a sluggishness that results from a poorly conceived script.

There is a mad rush towards the end assembling a jumble of events to materialize a set of twists just to put things in order. In spite of all its earnestness, the attempt fails pushing the movie to levels of mediocrity. Dileep holds on to his casual, ticklish humour which salvages the film to a certain extent.

Rating:***

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/malayalam/movies/movie-reviews/Ezhu-Sundara-Rathrikal/movie-review/27751741.cms

Thalaimuraigal Reviews from Times of India!

Synopsis: A haughty old man, who is estranged from his son for over 12 years, starts looking at life in a different perspective when his grandson comes to stay with him. 

Movie Review: For retired Tamil teacher Subbu (Balu Mahendra), it is his religion, caste and language that are close to his heart. For 12 years, he has not been on speaking terms with his son Sivaraman (Sashi Kumar), a doctor, who married Stella ( Ramya Shankar), a Christian girl and an orphan, against his wishes. But when Sivaraman hears that his father had suffered a stroke, he goes to his village at the insistence of Stella, who wants their son Aditya ( Master Karthick) to get to know his grandfather.

This is the set up of Balu Mahendra's Thalaimuraigal, a drama on human relationships that puts across the one question that matters in the end — 'who am I?' Midway into the film, Aditya gives a photograph of himself to his asks his grandfather if he could say who the person in the photograph is. The old man replies that it is just a piece of paper and questions the kid who he really is. Subbu delivers this line in a haughty manner, probably expecting his grandson to acknowledge his lineage (in the form of religion and caste) but even he doesn't realize the profoundness in his question. In a later scene, the village's pastor asks the boy if he is a Hindu or Christian, and the kid says that he is Aditya, and only then we realize how the boy has come to terms with his self.

It is this kind of understatement that sets Thalaimuraigal apart from current films. The scenes mostly come across as moments captured from the life of the film's characters rather than as part of a narrative. The director shoots the film with minimal fuss — the shots are held longer than in present-day films, and the camera often stays at rest, capturing everything in its frame. Ilaiyaraaja's background score too features large stretches of silences that feel alien to the insistent sounds in commercial films. Even the emotional scenes are not underscored with stirring music and it is left to us to imbibe the emotions from the performances. And this simplicity is reflected even in the scenes showing the bonding of grandfather and grandson. The kid doesn't know Tamil (Stella is from Bangalore and she converses with her husband mainly in English) and the old man isn't used to English. He begins teaching the boy Tamil and we see shots of them learning from each other at various locations and at various times, and they build up a rapport over time.

It is only in the pre-interval scene that there is a sense of urgency — a lady comes to Subbu and pleads with him to save her son who has been bitten by a snake — and the scene feels quite cinematic but this is probably because it is in our habit to expect a twist during at the interval point.

The only problem with the film is that it resolves many of the characters' issues quite conveniently. It redeems Subbu when he starts bonding with his grandson but never quite acknowledges his patriarchal mindset that dashed the hopes of his daughter. We get a scene where the daughter tells her brother that their father took out the anger he had for his son on her by putting an end to her studies and turning her into a child-bearing machine. But we never see Subbu recognizing his failings with respect to his daughter. In fact, while he instantly develops an attachment with his son's offspring, we are left wondering about his relationship with his other grandsons, who were born to his daughter. Maybe, Balu Mahendra wants to tell us that it is not possible to right all the wrongs we have done in our lifetime.

We also wish that the argument between Sivaraman and Stella over Aditya staying in the village had a bit more bite. It is a bit hard to believe that he gives in so easily when Stella counters his very valid reservations with the simple point that Aditya will learn much because Siva himself had studied in the village. Less practical and more romantic.

But there is plenty of genuineness and warmth, which, elevated by the minimalist storytelling and genteel performances (director-actor Sasikumar's cameo is the only false note) turn this simple film into the feel-good film of the year.

Note: Strictly for those who like leisurely-paced slice of life films that are more enlightening than they are entertaining.

Rating:****

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/tamil/movie-reviews/moviereviewarticlelist/thalaimuraigal/movie-review/28019810.cms

Agadam Review from Times of India!

Synopsis: Three men bury a woman they have murdered in the middle of the night. They get an unexpected visitor, who wants to do business with them. Soon, the ghost of the dead girl turns up before them sending them running for their lives.

Review: Oh, the irony that is the interval! You only have to feel sorry for Mohamad Issack. He has made a film that has been certified by the Guinness World Records as the longest uncut film but his very achievement is tarnished by the fact that the film is cut (read stopped) midway by the theatre operator for the interval.

In fact, indirectly, this very act is a statement on the significance of Issack's efforts. Watching the film, we realize that it isn't ambition or the subject of his movie that has necessitated this attempt but the need for such a gimmick to attract an unsuspecting viewer. This is novelty for novelty's sake, nothing more.

The film's plot heavily draws on Karthik Subburaj's trendsetting Pizza. If the latter film had an individual trapped in a lonely mansion that has a ghost, here it is four characters who are scared to death by a ghost in a house. The difference is that while Vijay Sethupathi was the protagonist there, here, the victims are all corrupt men, who distribute expired medicines and murder those who try to expose them. There is also a twist towards the end, as in the earlier film. And, like Pizza, this one too has been shot on a shoe-string budget.

But the comparisons end there. While Karthik Subburaj's film is a dazzling example of what a director with a command over his craft can do with a minimal budget, Agadam is a cautionary tale that proves that while digital has made it possible for anyone to make a film, not everyone should make one. This is an unnecessarily over-long film with a sloppy script, amateur performances, shoddy camerawork, template music and unintentionally funny sequences, with not a single redeeming feature (no, the longest shot doesn't count). The only horror here is not the one the characters experience but what we, the audience, undergo.

 

Rating:*1/2

 

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/tamil/movie-reviews/moviereviewarticlelist/agadam/movie-review/28463733.cms 

Vizha Review from Times of India!

Synopsis: Sundaram, a tappu player, is attracted to oppari singer Raakamma, but his act of helping a friend's romance threatens to take her away from him. 

Movie Review: Updating the classic Thillana Mohanambal premise of individuals in similar professions falling in love with each other, Barathi Balakumaran presents an old-fashioned romance done the old-fashioned way with Vizha. If the hero in the earlier film is a nadaswaram vidwan, here, he is a tappu player, who performs at funeral houses. The heroine is an oppari singer (in the older film, she is a Bharatanatyam dancer), and the 'saavu veedu' is their meeting place. We have had a few films based on this idea even earlier ( Karagattakaran and Sangamam did it in the late 80s and 90s respectively), and Vizha feels like an adaptation for this generation.

Tappu player Sundaram ( Mahendran) is attracted to Raakamma (Malavika), the young oppari singer, and she too reciprocates his love. When he helps his friend Pandidurai, who is a foreign return and the heir to the stuck-up local bigwig Bakkiyammal, get married to his childhood sweetheart, Bakkiyammal tries to get her revenge by arranging a match for Raakamma with Manimaran ( Yugendran), who works for her, and sending her goons after Sundaram. However, the good-hearted Manimaran offers refuge to Sundaram, and the lovers are left in a dilemma — should they stop the planned marriage or tell the truth to Manimaran?

The plot is a fairly interesting (even if it is familiar) one but what makes Vizha a lesser film than it should have been is the amount of unnecessary padding that the director brings to this story. He is severely hampered by his decision to take the 'whether Raakamma loves Sundaram' plot till the interval and so devotes the entire first half to the shenanigans of the hero and his friends which are so been there done that. Even the opening block, which he uses to detail the customs at a house of death, lacks the punch that it needed and so doesn't quite come across as atmospheric (this week's other release, Madha Yaanai Kootam, does this in superb fashion).

The second half is much better even though we are able to predict the outcome of certain scenes — when a character in an earlier scene tells Sundaram that he should play the tappu for his death, we know that he'll die in the end; and we always know that Manimaran will, in the end, stand by Sundaram. Still, Balakumaran manages to pack a punch in the scene where the lover affair between the leads comes out in the open. James Vasanthan's song too plays a crucial role in elevating the emotion here (and, his score is a major plus throughout).

Rating:***

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/tamil/movie-reviews/moviereviewarticlelist/vizha/movie-review/28065951.cms